Parasite in contact with homosapien group, 2026. 

The entire social unit must be embedded with parasitic material in order to achieve psychological control. 

In conditions of isolated infection, the parasite fails to fulfil sufficient behavioural influence to facilitate its long-term survival. 

Therefore, through proximity, the social structure of the host group is utilised for propagation as the parasite gains access to its shared habitual patterns. 

A primary host emerges within the unit. 

This vessel serves as a temporary incubation unit, housing a comparatively higher concentration of parasitic matter. 

Authority surfaces wherever concentration is at its highest. 

We see the behaviour of the primary host begin to dictate the motor behaviour of others in the surrounding area, with methods of infiltration observed to vary in accordance with the primary host's previous character. 

The primary host status is not permanent. 

Concentration shifts between vessels, with an abrupt decline in perceived authority as the volume of parasitic matter decreases in an individual. This transition occurs without conflict: the unit appears unaware that the primary host has been replaced. 

The allocation of each individual is not influenced by previous psychological disposition. Instead, it appears that the parasite feeds on the natural variation of the species. 

The biological and psychological distinction between each vessel is viewed as a resource, with each unique trait metabolised — absorbed into the parasite’s adaptive programming. 

Regardless of the method of infiltration, the result remains equifinal. The infection will run to completion. 

Diagnosis relies on the observation of an infected group, dependent on the recognition of synchronised behavioural patterns across multiple vessels. However, there is evidence that observation poses a secondary risk.

Prolonged cognitive attention on the effects of the parasite appears to strengthen its potency. 

Observers may report increased identification with the study group itself after intensive examination of the infection process, suggesting that the parasite may be capable of entering an onlooker through mental engagement alone. 

As the infection progresses further, we see complete disintegration of autonomy. Identical posture, gestures and pace flow through the primary host to the remaining group with total synchronicity. 

No resistance among the infected is observed. 

Instead, displays of human leadership are mimicked with adequate accuracy to ensure compliance. 

Parasitic interference is believed to target the supplementary motor area and parietal cortex, explaining the damage observed to both voluntary and involuntary movement coordination. 

Movements appear as mechanical reflexes as the group now functions as a single organism, with severely diminished self-determination. This pattern is consistent across each infected member. 

As the unit reaches advanced stages of infection, a behavioural loop becomes apparent. 

Parasitic concentration, and therefore the role of primary host, circulates throughout the group indefinitely. 

Every switch continues to trigger unwavering, immediate submission. Motor function remains entirely dictated by the primary host, with no perceived psychological response to fatigue observed within the unit. 

This sequence persists relentlessly and without an identifiable resolution.

No immunity has been observed in homosapiens.